ESG Hedge Fund Classification Framework
By Gregory Neal
June 21, 2022
ESG is one of the hottest topics in the investment industry today. ESG adoption has been years in the making, and hedge fund managers have finally started to take notice. We have spent the last three years working with investment managers to understand their ESG approach. As you might imagine, the application of ESG in hedge funds is just as varied as the investment strategies they employ. The wide range of ESG strategies has created complications for investors. Until now, there hasn’t been a common language to aid investors, managers, and other stakeholders in their conversations about their ESG hedge fund investments.
After meeting with many hedge fund managers, it is clear that understanding the application of ESG by an individual manager requires in-depth due diligence and ESG expertise. Complicating the matter, there is no silver bullet for allocators to quantify how a given hedge fund uses ESG. There is not a single score or rating system that can comprehensively relay all the information needed to assess a strategy. While many hedge funds claim to incorporate ESG, it may be difficult to determine how well they do so versus their peers without doing the work.
There are managers that may invest in so-called “dirty” or “brown” companies. These companies have high carbon intensity according to publicly reported measures, but the manager has done their own due diligence and can see that the company has taken steps in reducing its carbon intensity, which has not been reflected yet in the data. This is just one example of how contemporary scoring systems cannot capture the whole picture.
Instead of a scoring system, we developed a classification framework to assist allocators in categorizing ESG hedge funds based on their investment process. The classification framework is meant to be used as a starting point and in combination with ESG and investment due diligence. By making funds classifiable and comparable, we aim to facilitate communication – between asset managers and their clients, asset owners and their boards and stakeholders, and fund managers and their investors.
Hands-on due diligence is required to truly understand and quantify how an investment manager integrates ESG, so we do not attempt to grade or opine on how well a manager integrates ESG. The framework is not designed to measure or rank a manager based on their impact on the world. Instead, it was created to assist in the initial categorization of funds, which then allows ESG investment professionals to explore and determine a manager’s level of ESG sophistication.
ESG Thematic Hedge Funds
ESG thematic hedge funds screen their investment universe based on specific predetermined themes, such as climate change, resource efficiency, sustainability, or energy transition, among others. Thematic managers may also use ESG integration techniques as a secondary factor.
ESG Integration Hedge Funds
ESG Integration hedge funds screen their investment universe using specific ESG criteria to conduct investment research. Some criteria include ESG scoring systems, positive or exclusionary screenings, or ESG risk management processes.
The framework initially divides funds into two main ESG categories – Thematic and Integration. The two categories allow us to understand if a manager is focused on investing thematically, aligned with specific environmental, social, or governance objectives, or if their strategy incorporates ESG factors throughout the investment process.
Thematic ESG hedge funds tend to screen their investment universe based on specific predetermined themes, such as climate change, resource efficiency, sustainability, or energy transition, among others. Thematic managers may also use ESG integration techniques.
ESG integration comes in all shapes in sizes. It can be as simple as negative screening for a company’s product such as tobacco. Or it can be as complex as creating an in-house proprietary ESG scoring system that analyzes their investment universe across a variety of factors.
The framework’s next level of classification organizes funds by their investment strategy. The second level is divided into five categories: Fundamental, Systematic, Macro, Arbitrage,or Fund of Funds. Coupling the ESG classification of Thematic or Integration with the above investment categories gives us the basis of our framework. We’ll revisit Macro, Arbitrage, and Fund of Funds shortly, as understanding the delineation between Fundamental and Systematic fund strategies—the largest subcategories—is critical.
Fundamental strategies utilize core economic, financial, and ESG data to determine intrinsic values and make investment decisions. In contrast, systematic strategies quantitatively employ ESG and financial data to make trading decisions in a rules-based system.
Fundamental Strategy:An investment strategy whose theses are based on firms’ financial statements, in both absolute terms and relative to other similar securities, as well as market indicators. Generally, these funds are of a bottom-up and discretionary nature.
Systematic Strategy: A rules-based, non-discretionary investment strategy that uses various advanced quantitative methods to implement trading and investment decisions.
This distinction is made because of the ESG data that is used in systematic strategies. As the old adage states, “Garbage in, garbage out”—The ESG data currently available is still in its infancy and cannot always be relied on unconditionally. This is not to say the individual sets of data are bad but rather that consistency is lacking because of the varying ESG reporting and materiality standards across the world. To further muddle matters, the data is then collected and combined by rating agencies based on their own methodologies. The data companies have the same intention of producing reliable, consistent company-level ESG data and scores, but as research has shown, scores for the same company provided by two different rating agencies may be completely uncorrelated. This inconsistent and, at times unreliable data coupled with the systematic strategies’ data dependence requires the funds to be separated from the more flexible fundamental strategies.
On the other hand, fundamental analysis allows for nuance in ESG approaches, data, and scores. The facts and figures can be analyzed in context by the hedge fund manager for a tailored approach. This does not mean that a fundamental approach is better than a systematic approach but rather it demonstrates the flexibility of a manager to do their own ESG anfalysis.
There may be exceptions to the framework, but that is why the ESG due diligence team’s knowledge and ability is critical to understand the nuances and expertise of a manager, no matter how they implement their ESG strategy.
While dividing funds between Thematic vs. Integration and Fundamental vs. Systematic coversmost ESG hedge funds (e.g., equity hedge, event-driven, quantitative equity, etc.), other hedge fund strategies, such as Macro, Arbitrage,and Fund of Funds, must also be considered. To address this, the Framework includes thematic and integration classifications specifically for macro strategies, arbitrage hedge funds, and fund of funds.
Macro Strategy: Macro managers trade a broad range of strategies in which the investment process is predicated on movements in underlying economic variables and the impact these have on equity, fixed income, hard currency, and commodity markets. Managers employ a variety of techniques, both discretionary and systematic analysis, combinations of top-down and bottom-up theses, quantitative and fundamental approaches, and long and short-term holding periods.
Arbitrage Strategy: Relative Value and other arbitrage strategies have an investment thesis that is predicated on realizing a value discrepancy in the relationship between related securities. Managers employ a variety of fundamental and quantitative techniques to establish investment theses, and securities range broadly across equity, fixed income, derivative, or other security types.
Fund of Funds Strategy: Fund of Funds invest in multiple hedge fund managers across strategies and may focus on investment strategies such as opportunistic, diversified, or defensive.
The HFR ESG Hedge Fund Classification Framework is designed to help hedge fund allocators and their stakeholders better understand how ESG fits within their hedge fund portfolio. We also hope that it allows hedge fund managers and their investors to compare and classify ESG hedge fund strategies. The framework does not grade a manager’s ESG quality, since ESG hedge fund strategies are so varied, and assessing manager ability requires due diligence. However, these categories can provide a common language that facilitates communication and reporting across stakeholders. The classification framework is just the beginning, a starting point for deeper ESG due diligence and investment research, but we also hope that starts deeper conversations about incorporating ESG into hedge fund investments.
Contact the Author
Gregory Neal, Director | email@example.com
A downloadable copy of this article may be found here.
Disclaimer: This article does not constitute an offer, or a solicitation of an offer, to buy or sell any securities, and is intended for informational purposes only. Any offer of an HFR Fund will be made solely by a Confidential Offering Memorandum, and then only to qualified purchasers. This document is confidential and is intended solely for the information of the person to whom it was delivered. It is not to be redistributed to any third parties without the prior written consent of HFR Investments, LLC (“HFR”).
Opinions, estimates, forecasts, and statements of financial market trends are based on current market conditions constitute judgment, may prove inaccurate, and are subject to change without notice. Our views, strategies, and examples may not be suitable for all investors. References to specific strategies are for informational purposes only, and is not investment advice, and should not be interpreted as a recommendation.
A Confidential Offering Memorandum will set forth the terms of an investment in a fund, including risk factors, conflicts of interest, fees and expenses, and tax‐related information. Such material must be reviewed prior to any determination to invest in any of HFR’s funds.
©2022 HFR Investments, LLC, all rights reserved. HFR®, HFRI®, HFRX®, HFRq®, HFRU, and HEDGE FUND RESEARCH™ are the trademarks of Hedge Fund Research, Inc.
Share this article on social media!